Facebook Blogging

Edward Hugh has a lively and enjoyable Facebook community where he publishes frequent breaking news economics links and short updates. If you would like to receive these updates on a regular basis and join the debate please invite Edward as a friend by clicking the Facebook link at the top of the right sidebar.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Estonian Industrial Output Falls 26.8% In January

It’s a depressing spectacle: on both sides of the Atlantic, policy-makers just keep falling short — and the odds that this slump really will turn into Great Depression II keep rising.

In Europe, leaders rejected pleas for a comprehensive rescue plan for troubled East European economies, promising instead to provide “case-by-case” support. That means a slow dribble of funds, with no chance of reversing the downward spiral.

Oh, and Jean-Claude Trichet says that there is no deflation threat in Europe. What’s the weather like on his planet?
Paul Krugman, yesterday


Well Estonia just set a new record this time round, for the sharpest year on year contraction in industrial output seen to date. The Great Depression II is evidently now among us, and it is currently visiting Estonia.




Estonian industrial production fell the most in at least 14 years in January, a further sign that the Baltic economy’s recession may deepen.

Output adjusted for working days dropped an annual 26.8 percent, the most since 1995 when the Tallinn-based statistics office started providing the data, compared with a revised 22.4 percent slump in December, the statistics office said today on its Web site. In the month, output decreased 4.5 percent.

“The contraction of external demand coupled with extremely poor domestic demand dynamics will play a major role in pushing down all economic activities,” Danske Bank A/S said in a note ahead of the report. It forecast a decline of 22.3 percent.

Estonian industrial production fell the most in the 27- member European Union in December as the global credit freeze shut off export demand, exacerbating a slump in consumer spending that began at the start of 2008. Companies including the local unit of Elcoteq Network Oyj, a Finnish electronics manufacturer and Estonia’s biggest exporter, and AS Norma, a seatbelt maker, have been forced to cut jobs and output.

Production of building materials slumped 44 percent in January, the office said. Output of metal products dropped 40 percent and chemicals production fell 38 percent.
Bloomberg

Monday, March 2, 2009

Saving Europe?

By Claus Vistesen: Copenhagen


It appears that many of us have had quite a bit of a weekend these past days. Sitting here in Barcelona’s airport I can look back at some very nice dinners and conversations in the company of friends and colleagues as well as the odd stroll down La Rambla. I can also look back at some nice cultural experiences in the form of trips to the Museum of Contemporary Art to see the exhibitions of Thomas Bayrle, Joan Rabascall, and Cildo Meireles and a visit to the National Museum of Catalonia where I only managed to see but a small bit of its extremely well endowed selection of Catalonian painters not to mention their fascinating display of church frescos and artifacts.

All in all, a most satisfying and enriching weekend for me.

However, perhaps not all would be able to say that I’d imagine; at least not with a straight face. I am of course thinking about the big EU summit on Sunday where the lot of European leaders met to discuss the economic situation, how to deal with it, and ultimately how to avoid the whole thing collapsing under their feet.

One of the many interesting conversations I had here in Barcelona was with a very able economist at one of the universities who, as the first thing, asked me what a credible answer from the European leaders would be in the context of the unfolding mess. After pondering for a minute or two, I answered that; above and beyond everything else I would like to see a common answer to the Eastern European situation and in terms of concrete measures I would call for a de-facto entry of the four currency board economies in the Eurozone (the Baltics and Bulgaria). Then of course and to be picky, a common statement towards the issuance of Eurobonds would not be bad either.

Looking at the various reports from the summit it is difficult to say whether the glass is half full or half empty. In fact, one has to wonder what in fact the grand leaders of our nations decided on, if anything at all?

One the one hand the pre-summit meeting by the Eastern European countries that resulted in a call for a common response to the woes of Eastern Europe was thoroughly thwarted yesterday, but then again on the other hand it does seem that the ERM-2 mechanism and thus potential way into the Eurozone will be eased; at least for some member countries. As the FT reports, the rather bold Hungarian proposal for a €180b aid package to recapitalise the banking systems of the CEE economies as well as to reschedule their foreign debt was rejected. However, what was committed to was a firm grip on the Eastern European crisis on a country by country basis;

“The fragility of the financial systems in several eastern European countries dominated an emergency summit in Brussels. Leaders of the 27-nation bloc committed themselves to “getting the real economy back on track by making the maximum possible use of the single market, which is the engine for recovery”, according to a communiqué.

The summit was called to reaffirm core EU principles, such as avoidance of protectionism and solidarity among richer and less well-off member-states, in the face of a crisis that is putting the bloc’s unity under severe pressure.

(...)

“More, of course, will be done, but on a case-by-case basis, not as a single category. In the new member states there are different situations,” José Manuel Barroso, European Commission president, told reporters after the summit.

(...)

“We help countries in need and we will do so further, particularly through international institutions,” Angela Merkel, Germany’s chancellor, told reporters.

“But I see a very different situation in different countries. We cannot compare Slovakia and Slovenia with Hungary,” she said, referring to two countries to some extent sheltered from the financial crisis by being members of the eurozone.”

Together with last week’s pledge by the World Bank and the European Investment Bank to lend up 24.5 billion Euros to troubled banks in Eastern Europe we are definitely moving somewhere. Yet, to play the role as scrooge for a minute I am note completely happy. In particular, I am not so fond about the narrative on heterogeneity among Eastern European economies and the need to discriminate between CE economies. Lately, this has emerged as the main discourse surrounding the measures taken to shore up the economies of Eastern Europe. Both the Economist’s leader and subsequent briefing highlighted this view as well as did the FT’s Thursday in depth analysis of the Eastern European malice. Far be it from me to disagree with the principle in this, but I cannot help but feel that pointing towards heterogeneity amongst the CEE is rather like pointing towards heterogeneity in the context of critical patients on an intensive ward. Surely, one patient may be closer to the brink than another but common to all of them is that they are in pretty bad shape. I would especially push this point in relation to macroeconomics where we know how contagion, much unlike the situation for patients in intensive care [1], can easily spread from one patient to another. In this vein, I agree with the remarks from the Polish envoy that the Eastern European problem, as a whole, should worry the EU. Oddly enough, German chancellor Angela Merkel was the European leader most ardently pushing the argument that a case-by-case orientation is the best solution. I find this odd because this was, presumably, the same Merkel quoted in Thursday's FT saying that she favored a global initiative on bonds to answer the growing need for many governments to issue more debt that normal. Clearly, there seems to be room for Euro bonds in this narrative and one would think that this kind of grand vision would exclude the kind of short sightetness shown in the context of Eastern Europe.

In relation to the nitty gritty details of potential measures and, as it were, things I actually agree with Eurogroup chairman Jean-Claude Juncker noted how entry requirements into the ERM-2 might be loosened. As clockwork, Bulgaria opted to enter the ERM-2 subject to a shorter time span than the traditional 2 years.

In my opinion this is an important initial step and what I would subsequently like to see is a swift entry of the four currency board economies into ERM-2.

Back to the Drawing Board then?

Despite the good intentions which it seems there were aplenty I still think the concreteness of the measures was too timid. Basically, there is a big difference between arranging a summit to quibble over the Czech Republic’s criticism of France’s proposed bailout package for auto makers and a full scale rescue plan for the European periphery. Now, that it seems that the former is taken care off, I hope that the latter will get the full and deserved attention.

Markets seem to agree somewhat with this sentiment.

Both Eastern European currencies and stocks have tumbled in trading today on the back of what has to be considered as anything but new measures (except for the ERM-2 initiative). From all analysts with eyes fixed on the issues the message is that markets are disappointed with the initial stab at dealing with the situation.

“The forint weakened 2.7 percent after EU leaders yesterday vetoed an appeal by Hungary for 180 billion euros ($228 billion) of loans for eastern European countries. Their currencies have tumbled this year as worries about the region’s economic region amid the global financial crisis have spread.

“Markets are somewhat disappointed, taking the lack of news from the EU as an indication that the EU may not have grasped the magnitude of the problem yet,” said Christian Keller, a foreign- exchange strategist in London at Barclays Capital. “We cautioned our investors on Friday not to position for a sustained recovery” in the region’s currencies even if a package had been approved.

(...)

Eastern European stocks dropped to the lowest in 5 1/2 years and Hungary’s forint fell the most in a month after European Union leaders rejected pleas for a region-wide aid package.

OTP Bank Nyrt., Hungary’s biggest bank, lost 5.4 percent to the lowest since 2001 after Morgan Stanley lowered its price estimate. Komercni Banka AS, Societe Generale SA’s Czech unit, slid 4.4 percent. The forint dropped as much as 2.6 percent, the most since Jan. 30, leading currency declines.

EU leaders vetoed an appeal by Hungary for 180 billion euros ($228 billion) of loans for eastern European countries, bowing to German concerns that it would put too much pressure on budget deficits in western Europe as the economy slumps. Hungary, Ukraine, Belarus, Latvia and Serbia have already been allocated more $35 billion from the International Monetary Fund to stave off defaults and prop up ailing banks.

“The failure of yesterday’s summit to provide any fresh thinking about Eastern Europe’s crisis means that investors are faced this week with the prospect of ‘more of the same’,” David Lubin, chief emerging-market economist at Citigroup Inc. in London.

Investors are exiting eastern Europe on concern that companies and consumers will be unable to repay foreign-currency debt as plunging exchange rates increase borrowing costs. East Europe has six of the 10 worst-performing currencies against the dollar this year. Equity benchmarks in Romania, Ukraine, the Czech Republic and Bulgaria are among the world’s 10 biggest losers, according to major stock indexes tracked by Bloomberg. “

Ultimately, a much more systemic perspective is needed here and we need to realize that a case by case approach does not work. This does not mean that the CE economies are not different; it merely means that the EU and the Eurozone need to see this as an integral part of the fight to keep the economic edifice from crumbling entirely. In his daily column, Macro Man opinions that EU leaders have pooh-poohed a blanket bailout for Eastern European economies; (with the USD subsequently sucking up all the safe-haven flows). I agree, but they will get another chance to save Europe and let us hope that they will come to realize the severity of the situation. In my last post I asked whether we are moving closer to a common European answer. This weekend brought the initial first steps, but or now, it is back to the drawing board.

---

[1] – One would certainly hope so at least.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Latvia Downgraded To "Junk" By S&P

And the Swedish Krona clearly didn't like the news.



Standard & Poor's Ratings Services today said it had lowered its sovereign credit ratings on the Republic of Latvia to 'BB+/B' from 'BBB-/A-3' and removed the ratings from CreditWatch negative, where they were placed on Nov. 10, 2008. The outlook is negative.......

We believe the necessary process of private sector deleveraging is likely to continue over several years, during which time real incomes will decline, testing Latvia's commitment to both its exchange rate regime and its obligations under the EUR7.5 billion assistance program from the IMF, EU, and other official lenders. The adjustment is made more difficult as external demand for Latvia's key exports continues to decline."

The negative outlook reflects the likelihood of a further downgrade later this year or in 2010 if we believe the government is wavering from its economic agenda in a manner that intensifies currency pressures and risks delays in disbursements from official creditors. If the Latvian financial sector retains access to international markets at reasonable cost, economic prospects brighten on the basis of improved competitiveness, fiscal targets are met, and the near-term prospect for Eurozone entry improves, the ratings could stabilize at the current level.



Standard & Poor's also said it had placed its 'A/A-1' sovereign credit ratings on the Republic of Estonia, and its 'BBB+/A-2' ratings on the Republic of Lithuania, on CreditWatch with negative implications. Which means that both of these may be up for downgrades in the not too distant future.

The IMF are about to withdraw to base camp to observe developments from afar, although it is possible that they have laid out their "conditions" for the incoming government, but since they have no effective "interlocutor" it is not clear whether these conditions are going to be completely acceptable or not at this point. Christoph Rosenberg, IMF mission chief to Latvia, issued the following statement today in Riga:

"The program supported by the IMF, the EU, and other bilateral and multinational donors is meant to sustain policies that will put Latvia back on a sustainable path, not particular political parties or coalitions. As long as appropriate policies are in place, such support will continue.

As IMF Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn has said, the IMF will continue its technical work with the Latvian authorities. The IMF mission currently in Riga for the first review of the program has, jointly with a technical team from the European Commission, made a lot of progress in identifying issues that need to be addressed.

The IMF mission will return to Washington at the end of this week and continue its work with the authorities from there. It will be ready to return to Riga and continue the discussions after a new government has taken office."



While EU Economy and Finance Commissioner Joaquin Almunia seems to be hinting that the EU may be "readying up" intervention. Well, if that isn't what he's doing then I am at a total loss to understand what he is up to.



The European Union could have to bail out a member state in financial trouble but such a move is unlikely, especially among countries in the euro zone, EU economic chief Joaquin Almunia said on Monday.

States such as Hungary and Latvia have received assistance from the EU, and other countries within the 27-member bloc might need a financial support programme, said Almunia, who is European economic and monetary affairs commissioner.

"You can't rule out that a country outside the euro currency might come to need this assistance," he said during an economic conference in Madrid. "We don't think we'll get to this position."

Almunia said euro zone countries were better off and less likely to need EU help. "With the euro zone the position is not the same, either in terms of public debt, foreign debt or the ability to react to this recession," Almunia said.


And the cost of Baltic country CDS not surprisingly shot straight up:

The cost of insuring Latvian sovereign debt for five years rose on Tuesday by more than 30 basis points after Standard & Poor's cut the country's sovereign rating to junk.

Five-year credit default swaps (CDS) for Latvia were quoted at a mid-price of 977.4 basis points, according to CMA DataVision, up from their Monday close of 943.7 bps. Five-year CDS for Lithuania hit a record high of 861.7 bps after the S&P move, compared with Monday's 831 bps. For Estonia, five-year CDS rose to 733 from 730.7 bps.
Below is a chart for Latvia's 10-year Eurobond (quoted yield to maturity) maturing on 5 March 2018, it is now trading some 700 bps in the mid (755 in the bid) over the closest (by maturity) German bund. Apart from noting today's market reaction it is possible to see how the spread, after settling down following the IMF-lead deal, has now opened right up again to the level of the previous October highs.



Moody's Investors Service also said today that it can no longer rule out a Lithuanian currency devaluation, although it was at pains to point out that this was not its central scenario. In the course of its annual ratings review Moody's said the following:

"Even though the net benefits of abandoning the currency board would probably be negative, a devaluation can no longer be ruled out in the current environment, but this is not Moody's central scenario,"


Last week Brown Brothers Harriman & Co. warned that Latvia’s weakening economy might force the government to ease its policy of managing the lats, spurring all three Baltic currencies to break their pegs by mid-year producing a fall of anything up to 50 percent to the euro.

“Latvia stands out as the weakest of the three because its external debt is very high and it’s got a big current-account deficit,” said Win Thin, New York-based senior currency strategist at the oldest privately-owned U.S. bank. “The contagion between the three is so strong that if Latvia broke the others wouldn’t be able to resist.”


Standard and Poor's also issued a more general warning today about the parlous state of many of the Eastern economies. In a report titled "Market Dislocation Exposes Vulnerability Of Eastern European Economies," published yesterday the agency stated that the resilience of Eastern European economies seems to be crumbling under the weight of high foreign currency debt and the potential reprioritization of lending among foreign banks.

"The financial crisis that started to hit developed economies after August 2007 did not immediately affect East European economies," said Jean-Michel Six, Standard & Poor's chief economist for Europe. "In fact, through the first half of 2008 their economic prospects still appeared resilient. But in the second half of 2008, the effects of the crisis started to filter through the region and are now gathering momentum."


In particular S&P's singled out the Baltics, Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria as especially vulnerable.

The Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania), Bulgaria, Hungary, and Romania. For this group the level of economic vulnerability is high. The Baltic states face significant external financing requirements that make them highly vulnerable to a cut-off in capital flows. Each maintains a currency board (except for Latvia), and the pegs to which their currencies are linked remain under heavy pressure, as they have since the middle of last year. Bulgaria's main vulnerability, meanwhile, remains its massive current account deficit. As foreign financing becomes much tighter, the Bulgarian economy is likely to experience a painful period of adjustment in 2009 and 2010, with GDP growing about 1% this year and close to 2% in 2010, and a negative growth scenario cannot be excluded. A similar rationale applies to Hungary, where we expect GDP to decline by 2.5% this year before experiencing a mild recovery of 0.5% in 2010. Romania, once one of the economic high-fliers, is also poised to slow sharply in 2009. After an impressive 7.3% in 2008, we believe GDP growth will plummet to 0.8% this year.

Monday, February 23, 2009

The Price Of Inaction On the Baltic Pegs

This morning I have been reading a story from Baltic Business News about the Estonian vegetable market. It seems recent devaluations among the Baltic neighbours (especially Poland and Ukraine, I suppose) are making imported vegetables much cheaper than the homegrown ones. This is a perfectly predicatble problem for those who understand a little economics. The issue is, how much structural damage to your economies are you willing to accept before you finally fold, as the article explains, instead of attracting investments to make a new, productive and highly profitable industry (what the proponents of the measured internal deflation option suggested would happen) whole sectors of Estonian economic activity - in this case agriculture - seem to be in danger of extinction. It is hard to see what can emerge from any of this that is positive, the debt defaults in euro loans will come just the same as wages fall and unemployment rises. It will take more time to get there, that is all.

Import vegetables have make up third of what is sold, but the amount of imported fruits exeeds the amount of local fruits ten times, Maaleht reports. “We’re in a silly situation – people have started to eat more vegetables and fruits, but there aren’t any domestic ones since small producers end operating for loss. So our markets are open for import products,” Kalle Reiter, the chairperson of Eesti Aiandusliit (Estonian Horticultural Union – edit) said. He said that horticultural activities may die if they won’t be supported at national level. The counterparts in other countries get support from the state.



Bloomberg has a reasonable article today summing up the state of play. Joaquin Almunia once more reveals that he understands very little economics:

European countries with currency boards “have to worry less” about the global credit crisis than those with floating exchange rates, European Union Monetary Affairs Commissioner Joaquin Almunia told Eesti Paeevaleht in an interview. “Regarding Estonia and other countries that use currency board systems, one has to say that a currency peg is a positive element,” Almunia was quoted as saying. “It ensures that the currency is stable, even in very volatile market conditions.”


While RBS analyst Timothy Ash shows he gets the message:

“Essentially, it’ll be a political decision that the pain of holding these regimes is just too heavy a cross to bear,” said Timothy Ash, head of emerging-market economics at Royal Bank of Scotland Plc in London. “Their positions are just becoming more unsustainable because everyone around them is just letting their currencies adjust.”


As has Danske Bank's Lars Christensen

Keeping the peg “will likely mean a number of years of very low economic growth,” said Lars Christensen, chief economist at Danske Bank AS in Copenhagen. “Wages and prices will have to fall to reestablish competitiveness.”



Exports and Imports Fall In December


Estonia’s trade deficit fell in December from November, led by shrinking imports of cars and machinery. The deficit shrank to 2.8 billion krooni, and a revised 3 billion-krooni deficit in November. This drop in the trade deficit is, of course, marginally positive for headline GDP, but is also consistent with a sharp drop in living standards.




Basically, there are three ways to close the current account deficit, one is to raise exports and drop imports, the second is to reduce imports and maintain exports constant, and the third is to try and drop imports more rapidly than exports. This last approach (which is the no-devaluation one the Estonian authorities are going for) is consistent with the greatest reduction in living standards, and this is what we are getting, since while exports fell an annual 6 percent in December, imports declined by 17 percent.




This section in the stats office report seems pretty relevant:

The share of the EU countries (EU 27) accounted for 70% and the share of the CIS countries for 13% of Estonia’s total exports last year. Compared to the previous year, exports to the EU countries grew 5% and the exports to the CIS countries nearly by a quarter. The main countries of destination were Finland (18% of the total exports), Sweden (14%) and Russia (11%). The biggest increase in exports was to Russia (by 2.7 billion kroons).

In total imports, the share of the EU countries (EU 27) was 80% and the share of the CIS countries 12%. Compared to the previous year, imports from the EU countries decreased 3% and imports from the CIS countries decreased 11%. The main countries of consignment were Finland, Germany and Sweden. During the year, imports from Russia, Finland and Sweden decreased significantly (by 5.1 and 3.6 and 2 billion kroons, respectively). During the same period, imports from Lithuania, Belarus and Latvia increased and that was mainly influenced by imported fuels.


Basically CIS countries have been increasing their share in exports, and losing their share in imports. Given CIS economic crises and devaluations it will be interesting to see how all this works going forward.